Chapter 10 Definition of Allitism:

The innate, uncontrollable psychological tendency that binds a person emotionally and morally to make the right choice each and every time except being biased and own group, clan, or race, producing an instinctive drive to protect and uplift it — and emotional distress when it is harmed, insulted, or defeated. Where enmit betray their own group the allit don’t, where’s enmit can cross their limits and help their enemy group the allit just stick to their neutral ground and can choose to be on the correct path except getting driven by helping the unethical deeds of their enemy group unlike the enmits. Allits are far better at judging any vital topic neutrally. Where’s enmits will be partially biased or shamelessly biased on every topic just to prove themselves or their enemy on the right side every time they are being questioned.

Allitism is the natural counterforce to Enmitism — where Enmitism destroys the self through enemy alignment, Allitism preserves the self through communal devotion and especially holding the neutral ground and takes the good path to follow without thinking of helping their own group or the enemy group. 

Remember if someone called himself an allit, doesn’t make him an allit but his taken steps does.

This a phycological fact and Allitism is not an ideology but instinctive phycological behavior which is not adoptive.

Definition of Allit:

Word formation of allit — Ally + Elite = Allit

Al → from all- (root of “ally”) symbolizing the entirety of one’s own kind or clan and being respectful and friendly to any old or newly arrived topic.

lit → patterned after (elite), denoting a person under a deep, psychological condition or compulsion.

A person who, by innate psychologically and morally to make the right choice each and every time except being biased compulsively and supports and uplifts their own clan, group, or race — deriving emotional satisfaction by making the most neutral choice and fulfillment from it and their community’s success, unity, and survival.

An Allit feels sorrow, unrest, or pain when they see unjust, inequality and discrimination or their group being harmed or humiliated, and instinctive joy when it prospers.

This drive is not ideological, not taught, but deeply instinctual — a natural alignment with one’s own kind and neutrality.

Key characteristics of an Allit:

1. Feels joy when their people prosper; sorrow when they fail.

2. Always sacrifice self-clan interest and be neutral for collective well-being for the future.

3. Feels instinctive protectiveness toward their community’s dignity and survival.

4. Cannot emotionally tolerate betrayal or humiliation of their group if they are holding the correct ground.

5. Acts out of internal identification rather than external rewards if they are on the right path.

Allits are the rarest in human society. Usually, Allits are born into religious families, but when they undergo ideological conversion, they mostly choose to become atheists, except in cases where they convert to another religion.

Father 

Mother 

Allit

Prodit 

Child 

Allit 

In the above table we can see the father is an allit and the mother is prodit and the child became allit like the father.

An example of an allit: Vinayak Damodar Savarkar

Vinayak Damodar Savarkar is generally described as an atheist or at least a strong rationalist who rejected traditional religious belief.

He did not believe in a personal God, divine intervention, or ritual-based religion. He openly criticized superstition, idol worship, and what he saw as blind faith. In that sense, he was not a practicing religious Hindu.

But here is the important distinction:

Even though he was personally atheist, he promoted Hindutva as a cultural and political identity, not strictly as a religious doctrine. For him, “Hindu” was more about shared civilization, land, ancestry, and culture than about belief in God.

So:

Personal belief → atheist / non-theistic

Political identity → strongly Hindu nationalist

This is why many people find him complex or contradictory. He separated religion as faith from Hindu identity as nation and culture. He was an atheist, but he realized that his own community, the Hindu community, was in danger. So, above being an atheist, he supported the Hindu community by supporting Hindutva. A person who supports their own community despite being an atheist is an example of an allit. He left the religion but not the people to be harmed. This is what a real allit do. Having a sense of balance toward both sides.

Leave a Reply

Srabon Ghosh